PHILOSOPHY OF TESTIMONY
philosophical
issues concerning testimony
In
modern society, many of an individual's beliefs are either directly derived
from testimony, or based on other beliefs so derived. Are the beliefs quotes
from this testimony ever justified?
The
primary concern of the philosophy of regarding testimony is
epistemological. It show why such beliefs are
justified and unreasonable.
Going back to our primary project, this can be
further divided into two as normative epistemology and descriptive psychology.
Normative epistemology will tell us if there are conditions under which a
belief obtained by evidence can be justified and justified, and how a belief
system that relies heavily on evidence can be so. Descriptive psychology will
tell us what it really is to acquire human beliefs through evidence, and to
what extent our reliable systems rely on evidence to.
Our central question of testimony
can be divided into two dimensions, and presents four clear questions for
investigation.
1. Descriptive Local Question
2.
Normative Local Question
3.
Descriptive Global Question
4. Normative Global Question
PRINCIPLE ABOUT TESTIMONY
1. The conjecture is that it is a correct epistemic principle about testimony that,
I. Pure
Transmission principle (PTP)
II. Reliable
Transmission Principle
CONCLUSION
Testimony is a formal statement
saying that something is true. It may be oral or written. In a modern society
testimony thus broadly understood is one of the main sources of belief.
REFERENCES
- 1. Fricker, E., 2004. Testimony: Knowing through being told. In Handbook of epistemology (pp. 109-130). Springer, Dordrecht.
- 2. Epistemology of testimony https://iep.utm.edu/ep-testi/



No comments:
Post a Comment